Ericson and Wilkin
The suggestion that the mechanism involved in the rare two-photon
capture mode of pionic nuclei involves annihilation of incident negative
pions (
) with the soft positive virtual pions (
)
in nuclei, which is then subject to medium modifications by the pion field
of the nucleus, was first put forward by Ericson and
Wilkin (4). The authors explored various virtual
processes such as virtual
decay,
on virtual pions
in nuclei, and argued that these processes have observable branching ratios.
The Feynman graph corresponding to the annihilation process that
contributed to the double radiative pion capture on hydrogen was calculated
and the two-photon branching ratio was estimated to be
, an estimate that was an
order of magnitude smaller than the ones obtained by
other authors (17,18).
Nyman and Rho
Nyman and Rho (8) studied this process in the context of the
induced pseudoscalar form factor
in muon capture in nuclei.
The authors explored various possibilities such as pion condensation
occurring at or near nuclear densities, nuclear ``renormalization'' of weak
and electromagnetic vertices, etc., assuming that muon absorption and doubly
radiative pion absorption in nuclei complement each other. The authors
pointed out that
the dominant underlying process of nuclear double radiative pion capture is
the
annihilation in which
is virtual. The
authors further noted that this annihilation process is dominant in the
Coulomb gauge for the elementary reaction
, while the extent of
the contribution of this annihilation process in the corresponding
nuclear reaction was subject to further studies.
Christillin and Ericson
Christillin and Ericson (5)
developed a theory for the nuclear
process in 1979
assuming a normal nucleus with no anomaly due to the pion
field. The authors constructed an effective Hamiltonian from the individual
gauge invariant nucleonic process. They assumed that the reaction was
confined to a single nucleon, and
non-relativistic limits
applied. They calculated
the two-photon branching ratio and
angular distribution using the closure approximation and an assumed
simple shape
of the nuclear excitation spectrum. The emitted photons
were above the resonance frequencies
(when the photon frequencies match nuclear
frequencies), i.e., photon energy
MeV.
The amplitudes for the nucleonic process obtained by the authors were
in agreement with the calculations of Beder (7).
The authors found
that the atomic 1
capture is particularly
sensitive to pion effects given by the
annihilation graph,
while the 2
atomic capture is dominated by momentum-dependent
bremsstrahlung processes.
The authors considered the
process,
which is dominated by capture from the 2
state,
and calculated the branching ratio using
experimental thresholds.
The first estimate of the
branching ratio based on a unique nuclear excitation
energy
23 MeV was found to be
1.1
for
,
MeV, and
.
This method was applied to calculate the single radiative capture
rate and the obtained result,
, was found to be
in reasonable agreement with the experimental measurement of
.
Using a spectrum of nuclear excitation energies from 23 Mev to 35 MeV,
and without the closure approximation, this partial branching ratio was
improved upon, and the final result as quoted by the authors was
0.9
for
,
MeV, and
.
As we shall discuss in the following section, while the branching ratio
agreed with experiments, a qualitative discrepancy was found in the
shape of the
two-photon angular distribution in the backward angle region
(large
).
Gil and Oset
In the more recent years, using improved many body methods,
Gil and Oset (6)
calculated the two-photon angular distribution for the
C and
Be double radiative processes.
Exploring the renormalization effects of
virtual pions in nuclear medium, and
applying the medium modifications as corrections, the authors
calculated the pion two-photon decay width
using the local density approximation. They considered an
explicit sum over all the occupied states of the nucleons with proper
accounting for energy of the nucleonic states. Finite density
corrections, Fermi motion and
Pauli blocking were accounted for. The authors
thus avoided the closure sum and the dependence of their predictions
on the average excitation energy of the nucleon. The authors worked in the
Coulomb gauge where
contributions from the pion annihilation graph dominated.
Contributions from the pion and nucleon bremsstrahlung graphs
were found to be negligible. To compare their results with experimental
measurements, the authors took a weighted average of the capture
occurring from the different pionic orbits. The authors however, did not
quote a branching ratio for double radiative pion capture in nuclei.
As will be discussed in the following section,
Gil and Oset's calculations reproduced the strong peak at
large angles but disagreed with experiments in the small opening
angle region.