The CERN synchrocyclotron and TRIUMF values for the
C branching ratios,
and
respectively, are in reasonable
agreement. They also obtain reasonably similar two-photon
angular distributions.
While pion capture on carbon occurs
predominantly from the
states (Table 2.3)
the theoretical prediction (5) had been that
the bremsstrahlung graphs dominate the (
)
process (Figure 2.6). The two-photon
energy distribution as obtained by the TRIUMF experiment
(Figure 2.8) agrees well with the
theoretical predictions
of the authors (5).
However, the experiments indicated a strong peak at large
angles in the photon-pair opening angle distribution
(see Figures 2.10 and 2.10).
This was not explained by the theoretical calculations of Christillin and
Ericson (5).
One explanation for this
discrepancy might be
possible hydrogen contamination in these experiments, leading to
the sequence
and
.
![]() |
![]() |
Gil and Oset's calculations (6) however,
reproduced this strong peak at
large opening angles but disagreed with experiment in the small opening
angle region.
An important difference in the assumptions of Reference (6)
and (5) concerns the
wave pion capture which is
dominated by the annihilation graph in Gil and Oset's calculation but by
bremsstrahlung diagrams in Christillin and Ericson's calculation.
As mentioned in the earlier section, another difference between the
two calculations is the treatment of the nuclear medium effects on the
elementary (
,
) reaction.
The disagreement at small opening angles between the recent Oset and Gil
calculation and the CERN synchrocyclotron and TRIUMF
C results
is of considerable interest as the
annihilation graph is
expected to dominate at small opening angles, as predicted by
Beder (7).
Thus, our data on
hydrogen is helpful toward understanding the underlying mechanisms
of the nuclear
processes as well.