Next: Analysis of Data
Up: Two-Photon Trigger Rate and
Previous: Acceptance Studies
  Contents
Trigger Studies
Since at the trigger level, the reactions
(B.R.
0.39)
and
(B.R.
0.61)
generate a strong two-photon background,
the weaker
two-photon signal had to be isolated for the
experiment.
Determination of our two-photon trigger was based on
good selection efficiency for two-photon events
and good rejection efficiency for single-photon events.
Table 4.1:
Definitions of the loose, 2-D, 4-D
and tight triggers derived from the multiplicities and
patterns of the
and
trigger scintillators.
counters: the number of the
hits and the gap in
the
hits.
counters: the number of
valid
hits and the limit on the valid
range.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Trigger Name |
Fig. ID |
No. of  |
Range of s |
No. of  |
Gap in s |
| |
|
Scintillator |
|
Scintillator |
|
| |
|
Sectors |
|
Sectors |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| loose |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2,3 |
0 |
| 2-D |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
| 4-D |
3 |
4 |
2 |
2,3 |
0 |
| tight |
4 |
4 |
1 |
2,3 |
1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the May-June 1997 test run,
and
trigger rates versus various trigger conditions were measured.
Due to practical considerations, a CH
target rather
than a liquid H
target was used, and the carbon background was
subtracted from
pion stops measured on a carbon target, and trigger
rates were scaled from CH
to liquid H
.
Figure 4.2 shows the trigger rate
for the loose, 2-D, 4-D and tight trigger
conditions at magnetic fields of 1.2 kG and 1.8 kG.
The most noticeable effect was found to be the very large decrease in
the trigger rates between the loose and 2-D triggers
(rates of 30-110
) and the 4-D and tight
triggers (rates of 1-3
).
Figure 4.2:
The measured two-photon trigger rate scaled to liquid hydrogen
following
stops in a CH
target
as a function of magnetic field and trigger condition. For definition
of the trigger ID's see Table 4.1.
|
The trigger rates also slowly decreased with increasing field.
Inspection of the recorded events
indicated for the loose and 2-D
(i.e.
2 valid
) triggers
single photons dominate the rate,
whereas, for the 4-D and tight
(i.e.
4 valid
) triggers
photon-pairs dominate the rate.
Thus along with the
2
requirement, a
4
s requirement effectively
rejected single photon events from two-photon events.
For the final production run of April-May, 1999,
in addition to requiring a tight trigger, an excellent way to achieve
further reduction in the trigger rate was found by
rejecting the back-to-back photon pairs from
at-rest
by eliminating
triggers due to back-to-back
counters at the AHC trigger level,
followed by rejecting the back-to-back hits in the drift chamber cells,
called the
cut.
Reduction factors of 1.9 in the trigger rates were obtained
by rejecting triggers where the opposite
fired (i.e. if
1 fires
7 is not allowed),
and 8.5 by rejecting triggers where any of the
three opposite
s fired (i.e. if
1 fires
6,
7 and
8 is not allowed).
Application of the
cut meant that a
3 valid
trigger rather than a
4
valid
trigger could be used,
which allowed increased overall acceptance.
Thus for
final data taking, as described in Section 3.4, a trigger file mC3_gC1_rD1_OC3 was employed which rejected
back-to-back photon-pairs from
events,
required two or more
counter hits (n
2),
three or more
counter hits (n
3) and as part of the
hit pattern requirement, required that at least three valid
counters
fire.
In the following chapter, we describe the analysis of the
data.
Next: Analysis of Data
Up: Two-Photon Trigger Rate and
Previous: Acceptance Studies
  Contents
Sugata Tripathi
2004-03-27