Next: Experimental Search for
Up: The Double Radiative Capture
Previous: The Double Radiative Capture
  Contents
A first theoretical estimate for the rare
process became
available in published literature in the appendix of a 1960 paper by
Joseph (17). While mainly devoted to calculation of
electromagnetic corrections to the tree-level amplitudes for the
processes
and
,
noting that the
process is related to the single-photon
process by gauge invariance, the two-photon
matrix element (
) was estimated from the single-photon matrix
element (
) by,
![\begin{displaymath}
M_{2\gamma} = \bigg[ie\sum_{i}\varepsilon_{2i}\sum_{j}\frac{...
...rtial q_{ji}}\bigg] + [ \epsilon_1 \leftrightarrow \epsilon_2]
\end{displaymath}](img74.png) |
(2.1) |
where
= 1, 2; [
] denotes the expression obtained from interchange of the polarization vectors
and
in the first term of Equation 2.1. Index
distinguishes the various charged particles of momenta
involved in the process.
The two-photon matrix element as obtained from
Equation. 2.1 was based on fairly unrealistic
assumptions such as photon energies being vanishingly small compared to the
pion rest mass, and so, the validity of the estimate was not clear.
Joseph estimated the relative two-photon branching ratio
 |
(2.2) |
i.e. the ratio of two-photon emission to
single-photon emission for pion capture by protons
at rest as,
The single-photon process has a well known measured absolute branching
ratio
= 38.6% (1). Thus the two-photon
absolute branching ratio as estimated by Joseph was
= 5.4
10
.
Lapidus and Musakhanov (18) considered contributions from
various annihilation and
bremsstrahlung diagrams to the two-photon matrix element, and calculated the
relative branching ratio (
). They also obtained
expressions for the two-photon angular distribution and recoil neutron energy spectrum. The relative branching ratio was found to be
= 1.2
10
. Thus the
absolute branching ratio obtained was
= 4.6
10
.
This estimate had an uncertainty associated
with the energy sharing between the two photons.
Finally in 1979, Beder (7) presented a detailed calculation
of the
reaction
based on a pseudoscalar-coupled pion-nucleon theory.
Contribution from
and
capture were considered
at the tree-level. A number of amplitudes were discussed in detail
and an estimate of the dominant graphs
(Figure 2.1) were obtained.
Figure 2.1:
The a)
annihilation b) pion bremsstrahlung, and
c) & d)
bremsstrahlung graphs
 |
Following the treatment by Beder, if 
represents the invariant
amplitude for capture of a pion with momentum
,
the capture rate is given by:
where
is the atomic wave function
of the pionic atom.
The calculations were performed in a specific gauge where the
photon fields are purely transverse in the
N center of mass frame.
Also, while only the sum of all the Feynman graphs to a given order
is gauge invariant, contribution of different diagrams were estimated
separately to find the most important contributions to the
process. Noting that the two-photon decay following negative pion
capture in hydrogen occurs predominantly from the
state (
),
while the
state
(
) capture occurs mostly in light mass nuclei such as carbon,
the differential cross-section obtained for the
capture mode
of hydrogen and light nuclei was
found to be (Equation 4.3 in reference (7)),
and
is the invariant transition amplitude,
is the pion mass,
is the spin, polarization sum over the various
-
,
-N,
-
graphs and their interference terms,
and
,
,
,
,
are the spin and polarization indices (7) of the nucleons and the
photons.
The coupling constant
=
, where
= 14.2 and
=1/137.
This expression for the
two-photon process was multiplied by
to avoid photon double
counting, and numerically integrated. An expression for the single-photon
branching ratio (Equation 4.4 of reference (7)) was obtained
in a similar fashion, and the relative branching ratio was found to be
1.31
. Thus the absolute
branching ratio for the
reaction
was found to be
5.06
.
Beder found that, in the case of
atomic capture, the
annihilation graph dominates over the nucleon
bremsstrahlung, pion bremsstrahlung and
excitation
graphs. The various contributing graphs are shown
in Figures 2 and 3 in Reference (7).
The annihilation diagram was found to
contribute 65% of the total
rate and 90% of
the
90
rate.
Nucleon bremsstrahlung graphs contributed 30% to the total
rate. Neglecting the small contribution from the
interference terms,
about 5% of the total
contribution came from
excitation diagrams.
Unlike the annihilation diagram, the bremsstrahlung diagrams
were found to favor large opening angles for the photon-pair,
and consequently although the nucleon bremsstrahlung contribution is
significant at large two-photon opening angles, it is quite small
at small opening angles (see Table 3 and Figure 4 of
Reference (7)).
Using Beder's results (Equations A.1-A.10 of Reference (7))
the characteristic angle and energy partition dependences
of the various Feynman graphs contributing
Figure 2.2:
The photon energy and opening angle dependence
of the
reaction transition probability
using Beder's equations. The solid curves represent the
annihilation graphs, the dashed curve
represents the nucleon bremsstrahlung graphs.
In the case of the annihilation graphs the transition
probability is plotted for energy partitions
from 0.5 to 0.1 in steps of 0.1. In the case
of the bremsstrahlung graphs the transition
probability is independent of the energy partition.
 |
to the at-rest
reaction are shown in
Figure 2.2. The photon energy and
opening angle dependences of the transition probability
for the
annihilation graphs and nucleon bremsstrahlung graphs have
notably distinct characteristics.
The annihilation graphs are peaked at
forward opening angles (small
) whereas the bremsstrahlung graphs
are peaked at backward opening angles (large
).
Also, the annihilation graphs are strongly dependent on,
whereas the bremsstrahlung graphs are independent of,
the two-photon energy partition.
These distinctive opening angle and energy partition
dependences of the different graphs
allow for the experimental discrimination of the reaction mechanisms.
Thus, the two-photon angle and energy partition dependence of the
predicted
branching ratio is a critical test of
the theoretical calculations.
Next: Experimental Search for
Up: The Double Radiative Capture
Previous: The Double Radiative Capture
  Contents
Sugata Tripathi
2004-03-27